TSTP Solution File: SET623^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SET623^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:19:39 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10 % Problem : SET623^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Fri May 3 10:04:18 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.42 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.N94bHMtdu8/E---3.1_19920.p
% 0.15/0.43 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_ho_11 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_ho_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting ho_unfolding_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # sh5l with pid 19999 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_ho_11 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-DSSFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # partial match(1): HUUPF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # new_ho_10 with pid 20002 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_ho_11 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-DSSFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # partial match(1): HUUPF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_22, type, epred1_0: a > $o).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_23, type, epred2_0: a > $o).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_24, type, epred3_0: a > $o).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(decl_25, type, esk1_0: a).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(cBOOL_PROP_99_pme, conjecture, ![X1:a > $o, X2:a > $o, X3:a > $o]:(((^[X4:a]:((((X1 @ X4)&~((((X2 @ X4)&~((X3 @ X4)))|((X3 @ X4)&~((X2 @ X4))))))|((((X2 @ X4)&~((X3 @ X4)))|((X3 @ X4)&~((X2 @ X4))))&~((X1 @ X4))))))=(^[X4:a]:((((((X1 @ X4)&~((X2 @ X4)))|((X2 @ X4)&~((X1 @ X4))))&~((X3 @ X4)))|((X3 @ X4)&~((((X1 @ X4)&~((X2 @ X4)))|((X2 @ X4)&~((X1 @ X4))))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.N94bHMtdu8/E---3.1_19920.p', cBOOL_PROP_99_pme)).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:a > $o, X2:a > $o, X3:a > $o]:(((^[Z0/* 9 */:a]:(((X1 @ Z0&~(((X2 @ Z0&~(X3 @ Z0))|(X3 @ Z0&~(X2 @ Z0)))))|(((X2 @ Z0&~(X3 @ Z0))|(X3 @ Z0&~(X2 @ Z0)))&~(X1 @ Z0)))))=(^[Z0/* 9 */:a]:(((((X1 @ Z0&~(X2 @ Z0))|(X2 @ Z0&~(X1 @ Z0)))&~(X3 @ Z0))|(X3 @ Z0&~(((X1 @ Z0&~(X2 @ Z0))|(X2 @ Z0&~(X1 @ Z0))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cBOOL_PROP_99_pme])])).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ((^[Z0/* 9 */:a]:(((epred1_0 @ Z0&~(((epred2_0 @ Z0&~(epred3_0 @ Z0))|(epred3_0 @ Z0&~(epred2_0 @ Z0)))))|(((epred2_0 @ Z0&~(epred3_0 @ Z0))|(epred3_0 @ Z0&~(epred2_0 @ Z0)))&~(epred1_0 @ Z0)))))!=(^[Z0/* 9 */:a]:(((((epred1_0 @ Z0&~(epred2_0 @ Z0))|(epred2_0 @ Z0&~(epred1_0 @ Z0)))&~(epred3_0 @ Z0))|(epred3_0 @ Z0&~(((epred1_0 @ Z0&~(epred2_0 @ Z0))|(epred2_0 @ Z0&~(epred1_0 @ Z0))))))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ((^[Z0/* 9 */:a]:((((epred1_0 @ Z0)&~((((epred2_0 @ Z0)&~((epred3_0 @ Z0)))|((epred3_0 @ Z0)&~((epred2_0 @ Z0))))))|((((epred2_0 @ Z0)&~((epred3_0 @ Z0)))|((epred3_0 @ Z0)&~((epred2_0 @ Z0))))&~((epred1_0 @ Z0))))))!=(^[Z0/* 9 */:a]:((((((epred1_0 @ Z0)&~((epred2_0 @ Z0)))|((epred2_0 @ Z0)&~((epred1_0 @ Z0))))&~((epred3_0 @ Z0)))|((epred3_0 @ Z0)&~((((epred1_0 @ Z0)&~((epred2_0 @ Z0)))|((epred2_0 @ Z0)&~((epred1_0 @ Z0)))))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ((((((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)&~((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)))|((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)&~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0))))&~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0)))|((epred3_0 @ esk1_0)&~((((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)&~((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)))|((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)&~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)))))))<~>(((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)&~((((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)&~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0)))|((epred3_0 @ esk1_0)&~((epred2_0 @ esk1_0))))))|((((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)&~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0)))|((epred3_0 @ esk1_0)&~((epred2_0 @ esk1_0))))&~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0))))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~((epred2_0 @ esk1_0))|~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0))|~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0))|~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]), c_0_5])).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0))|~((epred2_0 @ esk1_0))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]), c_0_6])).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]), c_0_7]), c_0_6])).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred3_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]), c_0_8])).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (~((epred2_0 @ esk1_0))|~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]), c_0_6])).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (epred2_0 @ esk1_0), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]), c_0_8]), c_0_9])).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])])).
% 0.15/0.43 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]), c_0_11])]), c_0_12]), c_0_8]), ['proof']).
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.15/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Processed clauses : 12
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 11
% 0.15/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # Generated clauses : 263
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.15/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 6
% 0.15/0.43 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # NegExts : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of those cached : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7
% 0.15/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7
% 0.15/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.15/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 12
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8046
% 0.15/0.43 # Search garbage collected termcells : 97
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1792 pages
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
% 0.15/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------